I haven't put a single person on this forum on ignore because even people who repeatedly make really stupid posts can always post something interesting or worth discussing, and I always reply to the post and don't resort to diatribes about the poster. Remember when you accused me of making shit up when AMD demoed AotS on dual RX480 ? Remember how I just stuck to the facts and calculated a rough estimate of where an RX480 would land and you resorted to personal attacks against me instead of criticizing my thought process or calculations ? Remember how I was absolutely spot on when the card was released in the end? You could learn quite a lot from how I approach discussion. Nope, I just stick to the discussion at hand. If anything it's you who refuses to see the other point of view being fixated on one of two reviews using the ingame benchmark and totally ignoring the actual gameplay benchmark tests run by PCGH but you don't see me trying to make everything personal. We were talking about GCN makes worse use of it's more powerful shader array, and this is evident even in the TPU review. I wasn't trying to bait you, there's nothing to bait, I'm just reinforcing some of the things that were discussed in the other thread, it's not my fault you feel threatened by this. TPU has lower scores for the NV cards and around 10% higher for Fury X. Who is bashing anything ? Even in the bit tech review the Fury X is performing well, around 10% faster than a 980Ti lol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |